Advances in Human Biology

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 52--59

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two medical grade adhesives for the retention of extraoral maxillofacial prosthesis


Ankita Chitnis, Padmapriya Puppala, Gaurang Mistry, Omkar Shetty, Rishabh Shetty 
 Department of Prosthodontics, DY Patil School of Dentistry, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Rishabh Shetty
3/63, Parag, New Mig Colony, Bandra East, Mumbai - 400 051, Maharashtra
India

Introduction: The retention of an extraoral maxillofacial prosthesis poses a big challenge to the prosthodontist due to the complex and varied nature of facial defects. Several methods are available to enhance the retention of this prosthesis. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of polysiloxane adhesives and n-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesives in providing retention for an extra-oral maxillofacial prosthesis. Materials and Methods: The samples were prepared by bonding silicone sheets with pigskin. These samples to be studied were divided into two groups of 20 samples each depending on the adhesive used for bonding the silicone sheets to the pigskin. Ten samples from each group were subjected to 180° and T-peel tests, respectively. Results: The results showed that the mean peel strength (PS) in the T peel test was higher for polysiloxane adhesive as compared to n-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive, but the difference was not statistically significant. Whereas the mean PS in the 180° peel test was higher for n-butyl cyanoacrylate adhesive as compared to polysiloxane adhesive and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The cyanoacrylate adhesives proved to be better in terms of PS.


How to cite this article:
Chitnis A, Puppala P, Mistry G, Shetty O, Shetty R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two medical grade adhesives for the retention of extraoral maxillofacial prosthesis.Adv Hum Biol 2022;12:52-59


How to cite this URL:
Chitnis A, Puppala P, Mistry G, Shetty O, Shetty R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two medical grade adhesives for the retention of extraoral maxillofacial prosthesis. Adv Hum Biol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 May 23 ];12:52-59
Available from: https://www.aihbonline.com/article.asp?issn=2321-8568;year=2022;volume=12;issue=1;spage=52;epage=59;aulast=Chitnis;type=0